Next: Ontology satisfiability
Up: Class satisfiability
Previous: Class Satisfiability of OWL
Beginning: ORE 2012 Evaluation
Table 10 depicts the qualitative results for
the class satisfiability of OWL EL ontologies, hence the table includes the
outcomes not only for FaCT++ and HermiT but also for jcel.
6 out of 8 test cases were completed in less than 130 ms for all three
reasoners. Table 11 shows the average loading and
classification times for these ontologies. However, there were two test cases
where the reasoners needed considerably more time to complete the task, specially jcel (see Table 12
).
Table 10:
Qualitative results for the class satisfiability of OWL EL
ontologies
|
FaCT++ |
HermiT |
jcel |
CORRECT |
8 |
8 |
8 |
INCORRECT |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NO-REF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
EXCEPTION |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TIMEOUT |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 11:
Class satisfiability OWL EL: Loading and reasoning times
|
FaCT++ |
HermiT |
jcel |
# tests |
6 |
6 |
6 |
ALT, ms |
98 |
79 |
72 |
ART, ms |
36 |
65 |
125 |
Table 12:
Class satisfiability OWL EL: Reasoning times for hard cases
Ontologies |
FaCT++ (ms) |
HermiT (ms) |
jcel (ms) |
emap |
532 |
424 |
5,307 |
go-termdb |
832 |
639 |
8,284 |
Next: Ontology satisfiability
Up: Class satisfiability
Previous: Class Satisfiability of OWL